AI LEGAL TECH

Legal workflow automation, with the guardrails built in

LEXSAS is the AI legal-tech venture I founded in 2026. I design and advise on tools that take the manual work out of legal and regulatory operations, from intake and document workflows to research and compliance, with privacy, IP and governance guardrails in place from the start.

One legal matter, worked end to end at a supervised desk A legal pad. Under a matter header with READ, TOOLS and SCOPE chips, loose sheets snap into a named FILE. Inside a dashed MANDATE cage three lines are written while the sources, memory and tools slots stand ready. The work crosses to a REVIEW sheet, a person signs, a compliance bar fills, and the run closes on the RECORD ledger. MATTER 2026-117 READ TOOLS SCOPE FILE TYPE OWNER CLOCK STATUS MANDATE SOURCES MEMORY TOOLS REVIEW COMPLIANCE RECORD EVERY STEP, ONCE

FOCUS AREAS

Six areas, one operating standard

From intake automation to digital market governance, every engagement ends with controls the team can run day to day.

Legal tech and AI workflow automation

Designing and advising on AI-enabled tooling for legal work: intake, document and knowledge workflows, research and compliance operations. The aim is fewer manual steps without a lower standard of review.

AI governance and regulatory compliance

Privacy, IP and governance guardrails that ship with the tool rather than after it, alongside model oversight, human review and documentation. I work on the line between what a policy says and what a team can actually operate.

GenAI adoption for legal teams

Legal operations strategy for generative AI: where to start, what to build versus buy, and how responsible adoption actually happens. I have co-developed GenAI legal tooling in-house on AWS Bedrock and run the pilots that followed.

Data protection and data sovereignty

Cross-border data transfer and localisation questions under KVKK and GDPR, including undertakings and the practical controls needed when regulatory expectations change.

E-commerce and platform regulation

Marketplace and platform rules across consumer protection, advertising, intermediary liability and payments touchpoints, including notice and takedown under Law No. 5651. Licensing perimeter questions and the controls that keep a platform compliant at scale are part of the same ground.

Competition and digital markets

Governance, controls and strategy advisory for digital markets, covering parity clauses, ranking practices, pricing algorithms and bundling, with the decision records that show how each was set and who can change it.

APPROACH

Legal workflow management and agent design

Legal workflow management

Intake, documents, research and compliance run as named stages, each with an owner, a clock and a record. That is the difference a managed workflow makes: when a regulator, a client or the board asks afterwards, you can show who touched what, when, under which control.

Workflow agent design

An agent gets its mandate the way a new team member does: which tools it may hold, what it may read, where a person signs. That capability set is fixed before the pilot starts, re-checked on every model, prompt or connector change, and never wider than the matter needs.

What in-house teams and law firms gain

For an in-house team, hours on routine intake and first-pass review drop while every output keeps a named reviewer, so the record defends itself. For a law firm, matters move faster without diluting review, and the same records let you price the work, not the hours.

AGENTIC WORKFLOWS

A named file, a locked mandate, a signed record

This is the run itself: what an agentic legal workflow looks like on the desk, from the first loose instruction to the entry nobody can quietly rewrite.

Intake becomes a named file.

Loose requests bind into one named matter

Mail, attachments and notes arrive loose. The run binds them to one matter: an owner, a clock, a type, a place in the queue.

The agent works inside a fixed mandate.

The agent writes inside its mandate

Before a run starts, the capability set is written: which sources it may read, which memory it may keep, which tools it may hold. The agent does not leave that frame.

A person signs; the record stays.

A signature closes the run; the record keeps it

Output stops at a named reviewer. A compliance gate sits on the same line. What ran, who signed, under which control, is written once and not rewritten.

LATEST WRITING

Notes on law, regulation and AI

All insightsAll LinkedIn posts

FAQ

Common questions

LEXSAS is an AI legal-tech venture focused on legal workflow automation and advisory. It designs AI-enabled tooling for legal and regulatory teams, from intake and document workflows to research and compliance operations, and advises on responsible adoption with privacy, IP and governance guardrails built in.

Legal technology and AI governance, regulatory affairs and corporate affairs in regulated digital markets, e-commerce and platform regulation, data protection under KVKK and GDPR, and competition questions in digital markets. The work is grounded in more than 20 years of legal and regulatory experience, most of it in-house, across global technology, consumer and marketplace businesses.

Asim Serdar Yilmaz, founder of LEXSAS and a senior legal and regulatory affairs leader with more than 20 years of experience, most of it in-house and including Amazon and eBay, following private practice at White & Case.

Yes. Advisory, writing and speaking are available in both languages, from Istanbul and remotely.

No. LEXSAS provides informational consultancy on legal technology, AI governance and regulatory strategy. It is not a law firm and does not provide legal representation.

CONTACT

Let’s talk.

serdar@lexsas.com

Advisory on AI governance, regulated digital markets and legal operations. Speaking and board conversations are welcome, in English or Turkish. When you write, a short outline of the workflow, team and timing you have in mind helps, without any confidential detail.