Eight workflows, one standard
Each of these is a workflow I design with your team, build into the systems you already use, and run as a supervised pilot before anything runs unattended. Every one is the same machine at a different desk: a named file, a fixed mandate for the agent, a person who signs, a record that stays.
Four are set for an in-house legal team and four for a law firm. Every page below carries the same eleven headings in the same order.
The strip after each name shows which parts of the standard that workflow leans on hardest, in the order intake, mandate, review, record.
Four workflows for in-house legal teams
The volume comes from the whole company. The work is routing each request to the right place, keeping it supervised, and being able to show afterwards who decided what.
- 01Legal intake and triageIn-house
Requests from anywhere in the company land in a single queue and are opened as a named file.
- 02Contract first-pass reviewIn-house
Standard contracts are read against the review playbook and every deviation is marked by clause.
- 03Regulatory and compliance operationsIn-house
Notices, applications and regulator correspondence run in a single list set to the tightest deadline.
- 04AI governance and release gateIn-house
Every AI workflow has a register entry and every change passes through a gate.
Four workflows for law firms
The client wants speed and price, the partners want the standard kept. The legal work is done by the firm’s lawyers; the workflow carries the file, the mandate and the record.
- 05Matter intake and engagement scopingLaw firm
The instruction becomes a file after conflicts screening and a written matter scope.
- 06Research and citation verificationLaw firm
Every citation is checked against the decision’s own text and the check is logged.
- 07Drafting from precedentLaw firm
The first draft is built from the firm’s own archive and the source of each clause is marked.
- 08Matter record and client reportingLaw firm
Stage, owner and signature stay in the file; the report is assembled from that record at month end.
Where to start
For an in-house team, intake and triage, because it is the one that produces the baseline the other three in-house workflows are later measured against. More on that on the page for in-house legal teams.
For a law firm, research and citation verification, because a wrong reference is a professional problem before it is a client problem, and because the check is easy to measure. More on that on the page for law firms.
If a different queue is the one actually hurting, we start there instead. The rule is one workflow, not the right workflow chosen in advance by me.
How each one is delivered
The same way, every time: the workflow mapped with your team, the agent’s mandate written down, the reviewer step named, the record format agreed, and one pilot with a measure you set in advance. You keep all five.
A call of about an hour
The workflow, the team, the systems, the reviewer. No charge, no obligation.
A written scope
Stages, mandate, record format, the one measure, the dates and the price.
A supervised pilot
A baseline first, nothing unattended, and a pass or fail on a date fixed at the start.
The method behind all eight is the LEXSAS operating standard, in twelve numbered sections. The words these pages use are defined in the glossary, and the line between a workflow, a copilot and a contract system is drawn in workflow, copilot or CLM. Get in touch